Skip to main content

2026 Building Permit Fee Index: What 29 Jurisdictions Charge for the Same Project

First-party data study, published July 11, 2026. We priced the same two projects through 29 official fee schedules using the exact calculation engine that powers the PermitPrice calculator - every figure below is reproducible, traces to an official fee schedule with a verification date, and carries a scope flag where jurisdictions bundle different things into "the permit fee."

Methodology (read this before comparing)

Cross-jurisdiction fee comparisons are usually pseudo-data: a "$150 permit" that excludes trade permits is not cheaper than a "$400 permit" that includes them. This index controls for that three ways:

  • Same project, same inputs. Deck scenario: 400 sq ft or $15,000 estimated value (whichever input the jurisdiction's formula uses). New-home scenario: 2,000 sq ft.
  • Same engine. Every figure is computed by the PermitPrice calculation engine (v1.1) from that jurisdiction's official fee formula - the same code that runs the public calculator, covered by 121 automated worked-example tests. Nothing is hand-copied.
  • Scope flags. New-home rows are flagged A (permit fee bundles the electrical / mechanical / plumbing trade permits) or B (building permit side only - trades are separate line items). Compare A rows with A rows, B with B. The scope column states exactly what each figure includes.

Jurisdictions whose published schedule does not price one of the two scenarios (for example, Washington, DC's alteration tiers, or cost-based schedules with no new-home line) are omitted from that table rather than estimated. Impact fees, utility connection charges, and location-dependent surcharges (like Prince George's school surcharge) are excluded everywhere and noted where material.

Table 1 - The same deck, 15 jurisdictions (2026)

Residential deck, 400 sq ft / $15,000 estimated value, ranked cheapest to most expensive. These totals are the full building-permit package for a deck as each schedule defines it, including each jurisdiction's levies, application and filing fees where they apply.

#JurisdictionDeck permit totalFee basisData verified
1Irving, TX$65.00$15,000 value2026-06-24
2Killeen, TX$70.00$15,000 value2026-10-09
3 to 4Round Rock, TX$125.00$15,000 value2026-09-24
4 to 5Richmond, VA$144.75$15,000 value2026-10-21
5 to 6Frederick County, MD$157.00400 sq ft2026-09-23
6 to 7Harford County, MD$160.00400 sq ft2026-09-23
7 to 8Henrico County, VA$163.20$15,000 value2026-10-18
8 to 9Chesterfield County, VA$166.28$15,000 value2026-09-20
3 to 9Baltimore County, MD$105.00 to $180.00400 sq ft2026-11-04
10Anne Arundel County, MD$207.00$15,000 value2026-09-23
11Montgomery County, MD$223.87400 sq ft2026-09-19
12Georgetown, TX$270.00400 sq ft2026-07-02
13Loudoun County, VA$395.00 to $399.60$15,000 value2026-11-04
14Arlington, TX$405.00$15,000 value2026-10-06
15Fairfax County, VA$504.00$15,000 value2026-09-18

Key findings: the median is $163.20 to $166.28 (depending on whether Baltimore County credits its $75 application fee); nine or ten of fifteen jurisdictions land between $125 and $270. Fairfax County is about a 3x outlier vs the median because it prices decks at 3% of construction value plus a 2% state levy and a 10% county technology surcharge (FY2027), stacking three line items where flat-fee schedules have one - value-based formulas scale with project cost in a way flat-fee schedules never do. The two cheapest (Irving $65, Killeen $70) use flat per-project fees. Baltimore County moved from $85 to $180 when its new schedule took effect on July 1, 2026 ($105 deck fee plus a separately listed $75 residential application fee). The schedule does not say whether the $75 is credited toward the permit; if it is, Baltimore's deck is $105 and ranks third.

Table 2 - The same 2,000 sq ft new home, 23 jurisdictions (2026)

New single-family construction, 2,000 sq ft. Scope flag A = the figure bundles trade permits (electrical/mechanical/plumbing); B = building permit side only, trades are separate. This is the honest way to read the ranking - a B-row jurisdiction's all-in cost is higher than shown. Austin, TX is omitted from this table as of October 8, 2026: its FY 2026-27 schedule prints per-square-foot increments above 1,000 sq ft that appear misprinted, so no 2,000 sq ft figure is estimated (see the Austin page).

#JurisdictionPermit packageFee basisWhat the figure includes
1Lubbock, TX B$300.002,000 sq ftbuilding permit only; E/M/P add ~$0.21/sq ft as separate permits
2Killeen, TX A$410.002,000 sq ftincludes structure + all trade permits; plan review ($0.04/sq ft) separate
3Round Rock, TX B$485.00flat feeflat building permit; impact/utility fees separate
4Henrico County, VA B$693.60flat feeflat $680 + 2% state levy; trade permits separate
5Chesterfield County, VA B$747.68flat feeflat fee + 2% levy + $50 environmental fee; trades separate
6Corpus Christi, TX B$963.492,000 sq ftbuilding permit line only; plan review + trade permits separate
7Waco, TX B$975.002,000 sq ftbuilding permit + plan submittal + technology fee; trades separate
8Dallas, TX B$991.382,000 sq ftTable A-I building permit; trades and plan review separate
9Irving, TX B$1,000.002,000 sq ftpermit + plan review per sq ft; trade permits separate
10Frederick County, MD B$1,067.002,000 sq ftbracket fee + filing + automation fees; trades separate
11Grand Prairie, TX A$1,100.00flat feeflat fee bundles ALL trades per UDC 22.2.19
12Plano, TX B$1,115.002,000 sq ft$0.48/sq ft + plan review + plumbing certificate; trades separate
13Tyler, TX B$1,128.002,000 sq ftpermit + 20% plan review; electrical/plumbing separate
14Georgetown, TX A$1,150.002,000 sq fttrades included for new ground-up construction
15San Marcos, TX B$1,320.002,000 sq ftbuilding permit; trade child permits separate
16McKinney, TX B$1,360.002,000 sq ft$0.68/sq ft building permit; trades + plan review separate
17College Station, TX B$1,540.002,000 sq ft$0.77/sq ft building permit; trade permits separate
18El Paso, TX A$1,640.002,000 sq fttiered per-sq-ft bundles all trades; technology fee unpublished/excluded
19Baytown, TX A$1,900.002,000 sq ftflat tier includes MEP permit fees
20Denton, TX B$2,030.002,000 sq ft$0.94/sq ft + $150 plan review; MEP separate
21Arlington, TX A$2,156.252,000 sq ftTable 2 bracket fee + 35% plan review + the three $100 trade permits
22Montgomery County, MD B$2,649.152,000 sq ftper-sq-ft permit + DPS filing fee; WSSC/impact taxes separate
23Prince George's County, MD B$2,833.602,000 sq ftpermit + admin/grading/U&O/M-NCPPC + 10% tech; EXCLUDES school & public-safety surcharges

Key findings: among the A-flagged (trades-bundled) rows, Killeen, TX is the cheapest full package at $410 and Arlington, TX the most expensive at $2,156.25 (which also includes Arlington's 35% plan review) - a 5.3x spread for the same trades-bundled scope. Texas cities dominate the middle of the table; the two Maryland "B" rows top it because Montgomery adds a 50%-of-permit filing fee and Prince George's stacks component fees plus a 10% technology fee (and its school and public-safety surcharges - excluded here - can add thousands more).

Three structural patterns in the data

  • Fee model beats geography. The spread inside Virginia ($144.75 Richmond to $504.00 Fairfax for the same deck) is bigger than the spread between most states. What matters is whether a jurisdiction charges flat fees, per-square-foot rates, or percent-of-value - not which side of a state line it sits on.
  • Bundling hides real prices. Grand Prairie's $1,100 looks mid-table but includes every trade permit; Denton's $2,030 looks expensive but excludes them. Any comparison that ignores this (most do) misleads.
  • Small fees are trending upward. Every schedule in this index that changed in 2025-2026 raised per-square-foot rates or added technology/automation fees; none cut them.

Reproduce or reuse this data

Every row links back through its jurisdiction page (see coverage) to the official .gov fee schedule with an effective date. The underlying formulas are published as machine-readable JSON per jurisdiction (see our methodology), and you can recompute any figure with the calculator. Cite as "PermitPrice 2026 Permit Fee Index (permitprice.com)" with a link. We will re-run this index after each verification cycle; each figure carries the verification date of its source data.

Limitations disclosed

Building permit fees only - impact fees, utility/tap charges, zoning, and inspections outside the permit are excluded everywhere. New-home scope varies by flag as stated per row. El Paso's technology fee is excluded because its rate is not published. Corpus Christi's row is the building-permit line only (its separate plan review and three trade permits, each with $146.41 minimums, roughly double the all-in cost). Prince George's row excludes location-dependent school and public-safety surcharges. Loudoun County is the one exception to the zoning exclusion: it publishes its deck fee as a $395 bundle that includes a $165 county zoning permit, and the row uses that published bundle (without zoning it would be $230.00 to $234.60; the median is unchanged either way). Loudoun's row is a range because Virginia requires a 2% levy on building-code permit fees (USBC Section 107.2) but Loudoun does not say whether its published fee already includes it. Rank ranges reflect Baltimore County's unconfirmed $75 application fee: if it is credited, Baltimore moves to third and the jurisdictions between shift down one place. Baltimore County's row includes its separately listed $75 residential application fee, which the schedule does not state is credited toward the permit. Plano's valuation table rounds up to whole $1,000 increments; the per-square-foot figures shown are exact. Estimates are not official quotations - verify with your building department before budgeting or filing.

Written by: Munib Ur Rehman
Data verified against official fee schedule documents. Last reviewed: 2026-11-04.

Sources

Calculate your jurisdiction Compare two jurisdictions